Pfizer The Criminal Organization That Wants To Vaccinate You


December 2, 2020


First of we would like to acknowledge that this article was inspired by #TheMirrorProject and we thank them for their bravery. After watching their video on Youtube we thought is was very strange that a company who has committed so many infractions could be allowed to create any kind of vaccine, and even worse, try to make it mandatory! So we decided to do our own investigation. What we found is astounding to say the least. Hence the title!


The title of this article speaks for itself. But why do we call them criminals?[1] More than just an article this piece is an online publication that goes through some of the highlights in Pfizer's criminal history throughout it's (too) long existence. Every single part of this writing has been thoroughly documented by multiple sources and is a matter of public record.


All relevant sources have been duly documented and linked at the bottom of the article. We have also gone so far as to make offline and cloud backups of ALL pages we are link to in light of recent censorship of anything negative about Big Pharma.

We would also like to state upfront, we are NOT against vaccines in general. This article is not a bash on vaccines. Some vaccines have proven their value over decades of use. One example would be the polio vaccine. However other vaccines have no value at all (and we are speaking from both personal and general exerience), like the yearly flu jab.


The Background:


Pfizer was founded in 1849 by two cousins, Charles Pfizer and Charles Erhart in Brooklyn, New York. [2] Initially the company manufactured fine chemicals. Fine chemicals are single, pure and complex chemicals that are only produced in small amounts by multipurpose plants. Most manufacturing firms produce chemicals in bulk using standardized reactions. Fine chemicals, on the other hand, are produced by a limited number of companies. The manufacture around 350 different products.[3]

Lawsuits and Settlements

Before 2018 courts have dismissed thousands of cases against Pfizer and this has made the company cocky and think they could get away with anything. In 2018, Pfizer started facing a rising number of lawsuits for some of their most popular drugs and decided to resolve fraudulent marketing and health care fraud lawsuits.[1]

Pfizer has been sued for a list of products including:

  • Protonix
  • Prempro
  • Chantix
  • Depo-Testosterone
  • Effexor
  • Zoloft
  • Eliquis
  • Lipitor


This is nowhere near a complete list of drugs though. There have also been many drug recalls throughout the years. As far back as 2005 Pfizer had to withdraw one of their drugs (Bextra) from the market.[4]

Murder in unapproved clinical trials

Fraud by itself is bad enough, but Pfizer actually killed at least 11 innocent children while conducting unapproved clinical trials in Nigeria as far back as 1996. Each of four families received compensation in the amount of $175,000 (13?) years after this heinous crime in an out-of-court settlement.

After Pfizer gave them the experimental anti-meningitis medication, Trovan, in 1996, 11 children died and dozens were left disabled. The children were part of a group of 200 given the drug during a meningitis outbreak as part of an unauthorized medical trial comparing the efficacy of Trovan with the existing medication.

A whistleblower lawsuit filed by Juan Walterspiel, a former associate medical director of Pfizer’s central research division, who had responsibility for international protocol development. Dr Walterspiel claimed that Pfizer fired him after he warned the company—before and after the study was conducted—that the study methods employed by Pfizer in the Nigerian trial were “improper and unsafe.” Dr Walterspiel’s action has since been settled.[6]


Judge Shehu Atiku in Kano ordered arrest warrants for the head of Pfizer in Nigeria, Ngozi Edozien, and the senior officials Lare Baale and Segun Donguro, after they failed to attend court. Government prosecutors in Nigeria say that Pfizer used critically ill children as “guinea pigs” to study Pfizer’s experimental drug trovafloxacin.[7]

What Did Pfizer Have To Say About The Lawsuit?

Pfizer has previously said that it obtained “verbal consent” from the parents of the affected children, and that the drugs were administered in a way that was “sound from medical, scientific, regulatory and ethical standpoints”.[8]

A Question To The Reader And The Authorities

Since when are medical trials conducted with “verbal consent”? The FDA defines informed consent on their website as:


Information is provided to potential participants through the informed consent process.  Informed consent means that the purpose of the research is explained to them (participants), including what their role would be and how the trial will workA central part of the informed consent process is the informed consent document.


The FDA is in fact pretty clear in defining all the prerequisites for a medical trial. Here is what needs to be in place before any medical trial.

British scientists launch major study to uncover role of human antibodies and seriousness of Covid-19 cases


Before enrolling in a clinical trial, the following information must be given to each potential research subject:


  • A statement explaining that the study involves research.
  • An explanation of the purposes of the research.
  • The expected length of time for participation.
  • A description of all the procedures that will be completed during enrollment on the clinical trial.
  • Information about all experimental procedures the will be completed during the clinical trial.
  • A description of any predictable risks.
  • Any possible discomforts (e.g., injections, frequency of blood test etc.) that could occur as a result of the research.
  • Any possible benefits that may be expected from the research.


  • A statement describing:
    • the confidentiality of information collected during the clinical trial,
    • how records that identify the subject will be kept
    • the possibility that the FDA may inspect the records.
  • For research involving more than minimal riskinformation including
  • an explanation as to whether any compensation or medical treatments are available if injury occurs,
  • what they consist of, or
  • where more information may be found.
  • questions about the research,
  • research subjects' rights,
  • injury related to the clinical trial.
  • Research subject participation is voluntary,
  • Research subjects have the right to refuse treatment and will not losing any benefits for which they are entitled,
  • Research subjects may choose to stop participation in the clinical trial at any time without losing benefits for which they are entitled.


When Appropriate, one or more of the following elements of information must also be provided in the informed consent document according to the FDA website:


  • A statement that the research treatment or procedure may involve unexpected risks (to the subject, unborn baby, if the subject is or may become pregnant).
  • Any reasons why the research subject participation may be ended by the clinical trial investigator (e.g., failing to follow the requirements of the trial or changes in lab values that fall outside of the clinical trial limits).
  • Added costs to the research subject that may result from participating in the trial.
  • The consequence of leaving a trial before it is completed (e.g. if the research and procedures require a slow and organized end of participation).


  • The approximate number of research subjects that will be enrolled in the study.


A potential research subject must have an opportunity to:


  • read the consent document,
  • ask questions about anything they do not understand.

Usually, if one is considering participating in a clinical trial, he or she may take the consent document home to discuss with family, friend or advocate.

An investigator should only get consent from a potential research subject if:

  • enough time was given to the research subject to consider whether or not to participate
  • the investigator has not persuaded or influenced the potential research subject.

The information must be in language that is understandable to the research subject.

Informed consent may not include language that:


  • the research subject is made to ignore or appear to ignore any of the research subject's legal rights,
  • releases or appears to release the investigator, the sponsor, the institution, or its agents from their liability for negligence.[10]


Pfizer Accused of Corporate Greed and Price Gouging

In the United Kingdom the companies (Pfizer and Flynn Pharma), were also accused of price gouging. This resulted in a record £84.2 million fine by Britain's competition watchdog. The charge?

According to sources, Pfizer Inc and Flynn Pharma Ltd. were fined for abusing their dominant position in the U.K. by charging unfair prices for unbranded versions of the anti-epilepsy drug Epanutin. The amount the NHS was charged for 100-milligram packs of the drug "rocketed" from 2.83 pounds to 67.50 pounds, before dropping to 54 pounds starting in May 2014, the CMA said Wednesday. This equates to a 2600% price increase.[11]

The Competition and Markets Authority argued that Pfizer's epilepsy drug Epanutin was under price controls as a branded medication, so the company licensed the drug to Flynn Pharma, which could sell it as a generic, and jacked up the price by 2,600%. Under a supply agreement, Pfizer manufactured the med, and CMA said Flynn paid Pfizer more than the drug giant could charge for its branded version. According to authorities, the price increased overnight from £2.83 to £67.50 for an 84-pack of 100mg capsules.


Pfizer's Attempt At Dodging Taxes in The United States

On the Americans For Tax Fairness website, in a report dated February 2016, we found another damning piece of evidence where Pfizer tried to dodge paying taxes by merging with Allergan, a drug firm based in the tax haven of Ireland.

The report continues to explain how the move to Ireland will be largely a change of address to evade U.S. taxes, as the combined company will still be mainly owned by the current shareholders of Pfizer and will continue to be managed and directed from Manhattan.[12]

Pfizer Inc. and Allergan PLC terminated their planned $160 billion merger after the Obama administration took aim at the deal that would have moved the biggest drug company in the U.S. to Ireland to lower its taxes.[13]

The list of fraud, deceit and other illicit activities committed by Pfizer throughout history is actually much longer than what is outlined in this article. We only touched on some of the highlights in their less than illustrious existence. The fact that the British Government is using the exact same company that overcharged them for phenytoin sodium capsules is a mistery to us.[11]

In closing we would urge you to watch the video that inspired this article below. #TheMirrorProject

(There is a video that came with this report, but you’d have to go on the website referenced to see it.)




VAX ATTACKS: The new mRNA coronavirus vaccines will likely cause immune cells to attack placenta cells, causing female infertility, miscarriage or birth defects


12/07/2020 / By Lance D Johnson / Comments


Two brave doctors, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg and Dr. Michael Yeadon, have issued a motion for administrative and regulatory action to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) regarding the new mRNA coronavirus vaccines developed by Pfizer/BioNTech. They warn that the vaccines can attack placenta cells, causing female infertility.


The doctors petition for regulatory action that requires confirmation of efficacy end points. The doctors are petitioning the EMA for a stay-of-action, halting the emergency approval of the new vaccines until the companies can correct the study design to ensure covid-19 diagnosis/confirmation of data end points is true, and not based on mere, nonspecific symptoms and false positive high cycle PCR tests.


Doctors warn that coronavirus vaccines will cause autoimmune issues and infertility in women

The doctors warn that the study design for the hasty, phase three clinical trials has produced fraudulent data points which will lead to misleading public health guidelines and future harm to human recipients. The harm they detailed includes the development of auto-antibodies to polyethylene glycol (PEG) that will not only make the vaccine less effective but also cause allergic reactions and deadly adverse events. The mRNA nano-particles (active ingredients) are coated with PEG. Furthermore, the vaccines also contain mNeonGreen, an ingredient with bio-luminescent properties. Why is this ingredient, taken from marine invertebrates, being used in the vaccines?

Most concerning is the vaccine’s potential to cause female infertility. The mRNA vaccines are intended to induce an immune response to spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2, but these spike proteins (transcribed for replication within cellular ribosomes) also contain a homologous form of syncytin-1.

This natural protein (syncytin-1) is created from human endogenous retroviruses and is responsible for the placenta development in mammals and humans. This protein is required for a successful pregnancy, but after covid-19 vaccination, an individual’s immune cells will be trained to attack syncytin-1 (leading to potential miscarriages, birth defects and infertility). The study designs do not test for mutagenic or reproductive defects, yet the science of the mRNA vaccine shows potential to cause long term autoimmune destruction of the female reproductive system.


Vaccine study designs use false positive PCR results on controls to boost vaccine efficacy rate

The vaccine study designs do not test if the vaccine reduces severe covid-19 symptoms, including hospital admissions, ICU or death. The tests are not designed to determine if the vaccine can interrupt virus transmission, either. The tests are designed to see if the vaccine acts as prophylactic or therapeutic, but uses unreliable tests to manufacture fraudulent end points. Even if the vaccine was an efficacious prophylactic, it carries risk of injury; administering the vaccine to healthy, uninfected people doesn’t make sense because there are better prophylactic and therapeutic strategies that do reduce actual symptoms if the need arises, preventing complications and death.

The worst part of the study design is that it is based on fraudulent diagnoses of SARS-CoV-2. The doctors warn that “High cycle thresholds, or Ct values, in RT-qPCR test results have been widely acknowledged to lead to false positives.” They instruct the vaccine makers to fix the study design to properly confirm infection.

“RT-qPCR-positive test results used to categorize patients as ‘COVID-19 cases’ in the trials and used to qualify the trial’s endpoints should be verified by Sanger sequencing to confirm that the tested samples in fact contain a unique SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA,” the doctors wrote.

The vaccine makers are using fraudulent false positive diagnosis of covid-19 in the control group to make the vaccine look more efficacious. Since high cycle PCR tests have been ruled to be 97 percent false positive, the end points collected in the Pfizer/BioNTech studies could ultimately show that the vaccine is less than 3 percent efficacious, with potential to cause severe and lasting health effects, including but not limited to: infertility of women.

Maybe eugenics was the goal of these vaccines after all. Isn’t that right, Mr. Bill Gates?

Sources include:

2020News.ed [PDF]


adverse eventsautoimmune issuesbadhealthbadmedicinebadscienceDangerous Medicinedeath by vaccinesdepopulationeugenicsfraudulent study designInfertilityinflammationmRNA vaccinesPEGreproductive harmvaccine injuryvaccines




You are being offered the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2. This Fact Sheet contains information to help you understand the risks and benefits of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, which you may receive because there is currently a pandemic of COVID-19. The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is a vaccine and may prevent you from getting COVID-19. There is no U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19. Read this Fact Sheet for information about the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. Talk to the vaccination provider if you have questions. It is your choice to receive the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is administered as a 2-dose series, 3 weeks apart, into the muscle. The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine may not protect everyone. This Fact Sheet may have been updated. For the most recent Fact Sheet, please see




COVID-19 disease is caused by a coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2. This type of coronavirus has not been seen before. You can get COVID-19 through contact with another person who has the virus. It is predominantly a respiratory illness that can affect other organs. People with COVID-19 have had a wide range of symptoms reported, ranging from mild symptoms to severe illness. Symptoms may appear 2 to 14 days after exposure to the virus. Symptoms may include: fever or chills; cough; shortness of breath; fatigue; muscle or body aches; headache; new loss of taste or smell; sore throat; congestion or runny nose; nausea or vomiting; diarrhea.




The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is an unapproved vaccine that may prevent COVID-19. There is no FDA-approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19. 2 Revised: December 2020 The FDA has authorized the emergency use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to prevent COVID-19 in individuals 16 years of age and older under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). For more information on EUA, see the “What is an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)?” section at the end of this Fact Sheet.




Tell the vaccination provider about all of your medical conditions, including if you: • have any allergies • have a fever • have a bleeding disorder or are on a blood thinner • are immunocompromised or are on a medicine that affects your immune system • are pregnant or plan to become pregnant • are breastfeeding • have received another COVID-19 vaccine WHO SHOULD GET THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE?


FDA has authorized the emergency use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine in individuals 16 years of age and older.




You should not get the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine if you: • had a severe allergic reaction after a previous dose of this vaccine • had a severe allergic reaction to any ingredient of this vaccine.




The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine includes the following ingredients: mRNA, lipids ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate), 2 [(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide, 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3- phosphocholine, and cholesterol), potassium chloride, monobasic potassium phosphate, sodium chloride, dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate, and sucrose.




The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine will be given to you as an injection into the muscle. The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine vaccination series is 2 doses given 3 weeks apart. If you receive one dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, you should receive a second dose of this same vaccine 3 weeks later to complete the vaccination series. 3 Revised: December 2020




The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is an unapproved vaccine. In clinical trials, approximately 20,000 individuals 16 years of age and older have received at least 1 dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.




In an ongoing clinical trial, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine has been shown to prevent COVID-19 following 2 doses given 3 weeks apart. The duration of protection against COVID-19 is currently unknown.




Side effects that have been reported with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine include: • injection site pain • tiredness • headache • muscle pain • chills • joint pain • fever • injection site swelling • injection site redness • nausea • feeling unwell • swollen lymph nodes (lymphadenopathy) There is a remote chance that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine could cause a severe allergic reaction. A severe allergic reaction would usually occur within a few minutes to one hour after getting a dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. For this reason, your vaccination provider may ask you to stay at the place where you received your vaccine for monitoring after vaccination. Signs of a severe allergic reaction can include: • Difficulty breathing • Swelling of your face and throat • A fast heartbeat • A bad rash all over your body • Dizziness and weakness These may not be all the possible side effects of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. Serious and unexpected side effects may occur. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is still being studied in clinical trials.




If you experience a severe allergic reaction, call 9-1-1, or go to the nearest hospital. 4 Revised: December 2020 Call the vaccination provider or your healthcare provider if you have any side effects that bother you or do not go away. Complete and submit reports to VAERS online at For further assistance with reporting to VAERS call 1-800-822-7967. Please include “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine EUA” in the first line of box #18 of the report form. In addition, you can report side effects to Pfizer Inc. at the contact information provided below. Website Fax number Telephone number 1-866-635-8337 1-800-438-1985 You may also be given an option to enroll in v-safe. V-safe is a new voluntary smartphone-based tool that uses text messaging and web surveys to check in with people who have been vaccinated to identify potential side effects after COVID-19 vaccination. V-safe asks questions that help CDC monitor the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. V-safe also provides second-dose reminders if needed and live telephone follow-up by CDC if participants report a significant health impact following COVID-19 vaccination. For more information on how to sign up, visit:




It is your choice to receive or not receive the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. Should you decide not to receive it, it will not change your standard medical care.




Currently, there is no approved alternative vaccine available for prevention of COVID-19. Other vaccines to prevent COVID-19 may be available under Emergency Use Authorization. CAN I RECEIVE THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE WITH OTHER VACCINES?


There is no information on the use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine with other vaccines.




If you are pregnant or breastfeeding, discuss your options with your healthcare provider.




No. The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine does not contain SARS-CoV-2 and cannot give you COVID-19. 5 Revised: December 2020 KEEP YOUR VACCINATION CARD When you get your first dose, you will get a vaccination card to show you when to return for your second dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. Remember to bring your card when you return. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION If you have questions, visit the website or call the telephone number provided below.


To access the most recent Fact Sheets, please scan the QR code provided below. Global website Telephone number 1-877-829-2619 (1-877-VAX-CO19) HOW CAN I LEARN MORE?



The vaccination provider may include your vaccination information in your state/local jurisdiction’s Immunization Information System (IIS) or other designated system. This will ensure that you receive the same vaccine when you return for the second dose. For more information about IISs visit:




The Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) is a federal program that may help pay for costs of medical care and other specific expenses of certain people who have been seriously injured by certain medicines or vaccines, including this vaccine. Generally, a claim must be submitted to the CICP within one (1) year from the date of receiving the vaccine.


To learn more about this program, visit or call 1-855-266-2427.




The United States FDA has made the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine available under an emergency access mechanism called an EUA. The EUA is supported by a Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) declaration that circumstances exist to 6 Revised: December 2020 justify the emergency use of drugs and biological products during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine has not undergone the same type of review as an FDA-approved or cleared product. FDA may issue an EUA when certain criteria are met, which includes that there are no adequate, approved, available alternatives. In addition, the FDA decision is based on the totality of scientific evidence available showing that the product may be effective to prevent COVID-19 during the COVID-19 pandemic and that the known and potential benefits of the product outweigh the known and potential risks of the product. All of these criteria must be met to allow for the product to be used in the treatment of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. The EUA for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is in effect for the duration of the COVID-19 EUA declaration justifying emergency use of these products, unless terminated or revoked (after which the products may no longer be used).


Manufactured by Pfizer Inc., New York, NY 10017

Manufactured for BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH An der Goldgrube 12 55131 Mainz, Germany LAB-1451-1.1


Revised: December 2020

Tziona Yisrael

25 Bloggers posts

Ruby Francis 9 days ago

Wow Great Info